Rick Potvin's Interesting Topics / Email: rick_potvin@yahoo.com
Public posting no longer allowed as of Dec. 15, 2021 due to uncontrolled spam... Will update later.

You are not logged in. Would you like to login?

  • Index
  •  » Covid&CyberPolygon is part of TECHNOCRACY COUP
  •  » Jon Rapopport--> Sars Cov-2 has NOT been isolated.. vs. Reuters
  • Post a reply

    Write your message and submit it for approval Help

    Usage Terms

    Go back

    Topic review (newest first):

    2/16/2021 12:00 pm

    Jon's point is well taken... that Dr. Wu Zunyou, the chief epidemiologist at the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention says they did not isolate the virus.

    Reuters fact check team says sars-cov-2 has indeed been isolated.
    ttps://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-isolated/fact-check-the-virus-that-causes-covid-19-has-been-isolated-and-is-the-basis-for-the-vaccines-currently-in-development-idUSKBN28E2SB

    Brian Moss-- brian.moss@thomsonreuters.com --is the contact person for Thomson Reuters Trust Principles that seek to preserve its independence, integrity, and freedom from bias in the gathering and dissemination of information and news.

    I emailed Mr. Moss as follows...

    Mr. Moss-- Reuters reported on Dec. 4, 2020 that Sar-Cov-2 was indeed isolate but investigative journalist Jon Rappoport points to an interview of Dr. Wu Zunyou, the chief epidemiologist at the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, who says they did not isolate the Sars-Cov-2 virus. source: https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/02/16/they-didnt-isolate-the-virus/

    Jon Rappoport writes, to the Reuters' fact checked article's point, that the apparent isolation of the virus is not true. He wrote "I’ve also explained that the so-called genetic sequencing of the virus is another con. It isn’t the result of looking through some sort of cosmic microscope at genes lined up like cars in a supermarket parking lot. It’s a process using a computer program to stitch together DATA— PRESUMED pieces of a virus—based on speculation, bias, pretension, and sheer hype. Rather than science." End of quote.

    I think it might be incumbant upon you, Brian Moss, contact for Thomson Reuters Trust Principles, to double check your fact-check with Jon Rappoport. I'll post this in my own blog and track it so that my readers and Mr. Rappaport's readers can follow up on your double-checked conclusions. Jon Rappoport has worked as a free-lance investigative reporter for over 30 years. His widely read and reported blog is at NoMoreFakeNews.com.

    Board footera

     

    Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum